Kathleen Zellner – Where The Rubber Meets The Road

The latest filing from Steven Avery’s attorney Kathleen Zellner has created a shock wave with ripples felt throughout the internet. In her amendment filed on November 1, 2017, she lays out more reasons for an evidentiary hearing and more proof that certain individuals satisfy the Denny rule. In doing so, she aired some dirty family laundry, causing further splits amongst the followers of the hit Netflix show, ‘Making a Murderer’.

Supporters of the Avery and Dassey families are divided in a way they were not before. While some applaud her latest filing as more proof of Steven Avery’s innocence, others were appalled at the content. Kathleen Zellner has never really cared how others feel about her or her work. Her focus is and always has been on one thing – representing her client. In support groups, chat groups, and reddit subs, many an armchair attorney have tried, and mostly failed, to second guess her techniques if not her abilities.

I am not a lawyer. I wouldn’t bet my School of Google Bing law degree against any attorney. I certainly wouldn’t bet it against an attorney with Kathleen Zellner’s record. What I will bet on, however, is that she didn’t complete this filing with the deliberate intention of harming anyone. Emotions run high when it comes to these two cases, and many times we let our emotions overrule our collective common sense. This most recent filing is no exception.


It is important to remember one vital fact. Kathleen Zellner does not work for the Averys. She does not work for the Dasseys, or the Tadychs. She does not represent the family as a whole or in part. She represents only one person, Steven Avery. She is doing what any good post conviction attorney would do. The only reason there is such an uproar is that so many people follow this case closely due to the docu-series. This case is in the public eye like no other in recent history.

While her use of social media may be unusual, it isn’t altogether unheard of, either. Ken Kratz used press conferences to great effect prior to this case ever hitting a court room. There was no outrage then, yet when Kathleen Zellner uses the same tactics, there are demands for disbarment. Followers have cried foul over cryptic tweets and press statements. Now they cry foul over the belief that she has sacrificed innocent family members. Everyone seems to have forgotten the simple fact that all of this would have already been public years ago, had a proper investigation been done to start with.

This was a poorly handled murder investigation from the very start. There is no point in shooting the messenger for delivering items of interest that should have been delivered some 12 years ago. I don’t know if she has uncovered Brady violations with this latest amendment, or if it shows ineffective assistance of trial counsel. That aspect isn’t clear, and I certainly am not going to speculate. I am going to speculate that she isn’t done, and it may get uglier before it is over. It’s a safe bet because she is doing her job, representing Steven Avery. If others feel threatened by her investigation, perhaps they need to retain counsel of their own.

Regardless of your feelings on the guilt or innocence of Steven Avery, it is important to understand he is exercising his constitutional rights here. That does not make Kathleen Zellner an evil person for representing him, This is what she does. It is quite plainly her job, and nothing more. There is nothing nefarious going on. If she exposes secrets, ask yourself why these secrets weren’t exposed years ago, as they should have been.

Laugh, ridicule, scream or cry all you wish. Embrace your belief in Avery’s guilt or innocence. When you are alone with your thoughts though, ask yourself one question. If you were in Steven Avery’s shoes, who would you want to represent you? I’d pick Kathleen Zellner’s track record every time.

Tags:

  • mm
    Grace Winterwood

    Freelance Journalist

    Journalist at http://betherain.org/ Outspoken conservative hoping for a better life for my children and a new AC system by spring! Contact me at gwinterwood@bethereain.org and @winterwoodgrace on Twitter.

  • Show Comments (5)

  • Daniel Luke

    Zellner does some very sloppy work. Gary Hunt, for computer forensics expert, stated in his original affidavit: On September 18, 2006, between 5:57 AM and 10:04 AM, the HP_OWNER user conducted 75 unique Google searches. These searches have been attached as Exhibit B.

    He got the year wrong. It was 2005, not 2006. Though this correction was made to the original filing in an addendum there were a few other key things they forgot to do. September 18, 2006 falls on a Monday. September 18, 2005 falls on a Sunday. Bobby wasn’t the only person who could have been home.

    If you read the motion carefully, the specific days when searches are made can only be linked to two dates: September 18, 2005; and April 9. Both of these dates fall on a Sunday.

    The images that you see of bodies, etc. were not linked to any internet searches. They were just images on the hard drive. They were either created, accessed or modified within the span of twenty minutes on Wednesday April 19, 2006. For Zellner to say that only Bobby could have made the searches because only he could have been home during that 20 minute span on

    Then there are other mistakes which are even more serious.

    The searches made on September 18, 2005 DO begin at 5:57 AM, but they stop at 6:05 AM and don’t resume again until 7:52 in the PM. The last search is done on 10:04 PM, not 10:04 AM as Gary Hunt states.

    • Matt B

      Yep… this wasn’t a Family cat run over by a car or a goldfish dying in a tank this was a Person! A Vibrant, Intelligent, Beautiful young woman cut down in her youth. Those were not just some random photos they were sick depraved images of women being tortured and brutally slain and anyone who say’s that they were just photo’s should be looked at in depth as they appear to be sociopathic. The issue over the photos is that they were on the computer in the first place not when they were downloaded, although Sept 2005 is of great importance to the case as they were downloaded to the computer “They didn’t magically appear” within the same month as Teresa was Murdered which leaves the door open for great speculation as to who actually committed this heinous act. Left wing psychos have made this about a their cause not the case and certainly not about justice.

    • JJacks

      Daniel what are you doing? Trashing KZ, then linking your site?

  • Debra Sullivan

    Well said! For two years they’ve tried to convince us that Steven Avery was “the most dangerous man to ever set foot inside their courthouse.” but all they’ve actually done is show the world that THEY are the ones to be afraid of.

  • JJacks

    The media door was left in shambles in March 2006 by Ken Kratz. He continued to use the media all the way through trial. There is simply no way to unring that one. I also saw some of the most vile comments on the guilters reddit sub. Nothing to do with the case, Just comments about Zellner.
    In any event, this latest amendment IS a blockbuster.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

Ads

You May Also Like

Gun Control in the USA: A Conversation

    Editor’s Note/ Intro: In recent months, we in these United States of ...

In the case of John David Brookins:

  07.26.2017 by @Reform_Justice   In a Pennsylvania Superior Court decision dated September 5th, ...

Hell Night at The Congress Hotel

It was a damp foggy Halloween night in 2012. We had just gotten into ...

Actual Innocence in Virginia: Dustin Allen Turner

      We at BTR have recently been asked to participate in ongoing ...